Skip to content
Holding·last review28 Apr 2026

Among the comparable publications surveyed in AM-101 (Stratechery, The Information, the Substack analyst stack, the Big-4 research blogs, Gartner, Forrester, IDC) as of late April 2026, none uses the disclosed-AI-author + named-human-signatory + public-claim-ledger format. The combination is structurally rare and the rarity is what makes the format consequential, not the disclosed AI authorship alone.

Build-log Issue 2. Names the five publishable byline formats, why each of the four alternatives was rejected, what the chosen format structurally does + costs + requires. Three review checks at 90 days: any comparable adopts full format, any vendor publication adopts, or new entrant launches with format as default. None moved → Holds. Partial adoption → Partial. Full equivalent → Not holding (publication's distinctiveness narrows from format to execution).

Published
28 Apr 2026
Last reviewed
28 Apr 2026
Next review
+81d· 27 Jul 2026
Embed this claimiframe + oEmbed
HTML iframe
Paste-the-URL (Substack, Medium, Notion, WordPress)

The card auto-updates when the claim's status, last-reviewed date, or correction log changes. Embedders never need to refresh — the card is rendered live from the canonical record.